<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Tar and Feathers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogpig.com/news/plug-in-to-a-different-way-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogpig.com/news/plug-in-to-a-different-way-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>Free Passive Income Generation &#38; AutoBlog Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Watson</title>
		<link>http://blogpig.com/news/plug-in-to-a-different-way-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-31277</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 19:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpig.com/?p=1761#comment-31277</guid>
		<description>I believe that the &quot;happy middle ground&quot; can be found in the quality of an &quot;individual blog post&quot;.  There are many &quot;purists&quot; as you describe them that think they have to look at the entire blog and they seem to only place &quot;value&quot; on a &quot;following&quot; that they believe should be attracted to their blog in its entirety. 
 
However, much of the world is simply searching for a &quot;solution&quot; to an immediate problem.  They are seeking a page of content that provides them a solution to a problem.  Once they have their problem solved, they probably are not interested in becoming one of the &quot;followers&quot; listening daily to similar themed posts &quot;over and over&quot; again ... 
 
The &quot;readers&quot; of blogging purists that have to read daily the latest &quot;thoughts&quot; of the person they are &quot;following&quot; are but a small minority of the greater internet community.  Legitimately a fantastic niche of followers ... 
 
The vast majority are simply wanting a solution to an immediate problem. 
 
The pro-automated bloggers often are simply creating solutions to meet people&#039;s needs.  And if they are meeting people&#039;s needs - what fault can be found with that? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the &quot;happy middle ground&quot; can be found in the quality of an &quot;individual blog post&quot;.  There are many &quot;purists&quot; as you describe them that think they have to look at the entire blog and they seem to only place &quot;value&quot; on a &quot;following&quot; that they believe should be attracted to their blog in its entirety. </p>
<p>However, much of the world is simply searching for a &quot;solution&quot; to an immediate problem.  They are seeking a page of content that provides them a solution to a problem.  Once they have their problem solved, they probably are not interested in becoming one of the &quot;followers&quot; listening daily to similar themed posts &quot;over and over&quot; again &#8230; </p>
<p>The &quot;readers&quot; of blogging purists that have to read daily the latest &quot;thoughts&quot; of the person they are &quot;following&quot; are but a small minority of the greater internet community.  Legitimately a fantastic niche of followers &#8230; </p>
<p>The vast majority are simply wanting a solution to an immediate problem. </p>
<p>The pro-automated bloggers often are simply creating solutions to meet people&#039;s needs.  And if they are meeting people&#039;s needs &#8211; what fault can be found with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

